Whiskeyjack Posted yesterday at 07:57 AM Posted yesterday at 07:57 AM 12 hours ago, Floris Bennema said: Would be great to hear about experiences with a MFT camera. For instance with the Olympus 60mm macro (quite a hunter) and the Nauticam 45mm macro. I'm also interested in this, including the newer Olympus 90mm. I care less about the working distance change and more about the image quality increase I've heard people talk about.
Floris Bennema Posted yesterday at 08:34 AM Posted yesterday at 08:34 AM (edited) 11 hours ago, Byron said: I Just did around 30 dives in Lembeh and had the MFO for most of it, I think it's very easy good ot leave on for general macro shooting. You kind of don't notice it's on until you nee dit and it just allows you to get a tiny bit closer than normal. With regard to focusing quicker, I didn't notice that but I am pretty used to shooting macro and generally start off with the camera in pretty much the right place to make focusing instant. The image quality from it and it doesn't have any colour casts like some other macro lens such as the EMWL Hi Byron, did you notice a change in DOF using the MFO? You separated the pigmy seahorse by panning, it made me wonder whether the MFO make it harder to get separation by DOF. Specialy relevant for small sensors. Edited yesterday at 08:42 AM by Floris Bennema
makar0n Posted yesterday at 09:58 AM Posted yesterday at 09:58 AM 14 hours ago, Floris Bennema said: Would be great to hear about experiences with a MFT camera. For instance with the Olympus 60mm macro (quite a hunter) and the Nauticam 45mm macro. Same here. Also while the port chart mentions 45 and 60mm lense, 90mm is conspicuously absent.
Recommended Posts