Jump to content

Featured Replies

One thing I meant to say yesterday was to always be careful when lenses end up very close to the glass - I’ve seen a few times problems when the housing compresses underwater (more port sections - more o-rings - more compression), the port then pushes the lens and camera back in the housing enough that the push buttons on the back of the housing start activating.

  • Replies 85
  • Views 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Alex_Mustard
    Alex_Mustard

    I've ordered one. No idea on wait, but it would be conveninet if it came in time for my Lembeh trip in November. Very happy that it will work with TCs - something I used to value greatly with my Niko

  • Got the lens from Sony Italy today for testing! Using a 20 mm extension with the 90 mm port works — not perfectly, a bit too much space. (Marelux macro port is 97 + 20 extension = 117 mm;) I also trie

  • Alex_Mustard
    Alex_Mustard

    I feel that the Tamron 90mm and Sony 90mm are close to indistinguishable in real world underwater shooting. I have used the Tamron more this year than the Sony, but both are currently in my bag here i

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Alex_Mustard said:

One thing I meant to say yesterday was to always be careful when lenses end up very close to the glass - I’ve seen a few times problems when the housing compresses underwater (more port sections - more o-rings - more compression), the port then pushes the lens and camera back in the housing enough that the push buttons on the back of the housing start activating.

Good advice, Alex. In fact, the shortest option is really tight (basically the space of a business card), so I’m a bit worried about it. Anyway, I also tried the 97mm + 20mm combo and it's fine — there’s no vignetting with the close-up lens (SMC-1) mounted on the flip. So this is probably the best option: fewer extension rings, less bulky setup... (until the proper port will be available)

IMG_3999.jpg

I suppose I should chime in here. I've had several requests for 3D printed extensions, so I recently went ahead and designed/tested an N100 version. I made the prototype 17.4mm, as I believe that is the reported length difference between the Sony 90mm and 100mm lenses (if anyone knows for sure the ideal length for the extension for the 100mm, please let me know). It's simple to do other lengths as well (it might be tough to do shorter than 15-16mm with the current design, though). It has a bayonet but not a port lock, though that shouldn't be an issue if you use a vacuum system. I tested it to over 100m.

Obviously, a 3D printed plastic extension is not nearly as nice as an aluminum one from Nauticam, but I just thought I'd let people know about this option - especially for people wanting a non-standard length or to save a little money. I'm hesitant to mention price because I don't want to flaunt the forum's rules on self promotion/advertising, but I also know that's one of the first things anyone who's interested is going to want to know. So I'll just say that I'm thinking in the neighborhood of $100 plus shipping, but if the moderators want to remove that (or any of this), please feel free.

N100 17.4mm extension.jpg

That looks really nice Isaac! Given what Nauticam is charging for extensions these days that is extremely reasonable.

Edited by Dave_Hicks

2 hours ago, Isaac Szabo said:

I suppose I should chime in here. I've had several requests for 3D printed extensions, so I recently went ahead and designed/tested an N100 version. I made the prototype 17.4mm, as I believe that is the reported length difference between the Sony 90mm and 100mm lenses (if anyone knows for sure the ideal length for the extension for the 100mm, please let me know). It's simple to do other lengths as well (it might be tough to do shorter than 15-16mm with the current design, though). It has a bayonet but not a port lock, though that shouldn't be an issue if you use a vacuum system. I tested it to over 100m.

Obviously, a 3D printed plastic extension is not nearly as nice as an aluminum one from Nauticam, but I just thought I'd let people know about this option - especially for people wanting a non-standard length or to save a little money. I'm hesitant to mention price because I don't want to flaunt the forum's rules on self promotion/advertising, but I also know that's one of the first things anyone who's interested is going to want to know. So I'll just say that I'm thinking in the neighborhood of $100 plus shipping, but if the moderators want to remove that (or any of this), please feel free.

N100 17.4mm extension.jpg

Hi Isaac, really a nice try with 3D printing. Can you share more details about the material you were using, PETG or Nylon?

@flowdesign Oh sorry, the material is PETG. I've been using 3D printed ports myself for 5-6 years and making them for other people for a few years.

For others wanting to experiment with this type of thing, I should note that FDM 3D prints are not typically watertight. Special settings are required in order to achieve this, and one should do proper vacuum and hydrostatic testing before using them in the real world.

@Grantmac Unfortunately, I don't have the N85 design, but I could potentially add it in the future if there's enough demand.

How did you seal the PETG?

I am experimenting with ABS sealed using Dichtol for floats at the moment.

2 hours ago, Grantmac said:

How did you seal the PETG?

I am experimenting with ABS sealed using Dichtol for floats at the moment.

Just through tons of experimentation with print settings in the slicer. I get solid/watertight parts straight off the printer. A couple of the key factors are extruding around 1.1-1.2x more filament than normal and adjusting seam and wall settings so there are no gaps. I'll caution that, while it can be figured out. it's not easy. And settings that work for one printer model do not simply transfer over to another printer model.

1 hour ago, Isaac Szabo said:

Just through tons of experimentation with print settings in the slicer. I get solid/watertight parts straight off the printer. A couple of the key factors are extruding around 1.1-1.2x more filament than normal and adjusting seam and wall settings so there are no gaps. I'll caution that, while it can be figured out. it's not easy. And settings that work for one printer model do not simply transfer over to another printer model.

With some helpful tips from Isaac I was able to successfully make some Port Floats for my n120 Nauticam macro ports. I used a Bambu P1s printer but with ABS instead of PETG. Using just 4 walls of .5mm thickness, .1mm layers, random & staggered seams, 1.1x flow rates, and 10c higher nozzle temps I was able to get parts that are water and pressure tight to at least 35 meters. (have not tested deeper yet and don't have a pressure pot) 5% infill just to support the roof. It gets 300g buoyancy from a 200g dry weight torus. No coatings or treatments necessary. Beyond some light sanding, I don't do anything after they come off the printer. I probably have about 50+ hours of diving on my most used port float with zero problems. I weigh it periodically to verify that it has not taken on any water.

105mm V2.2.jpg

Edited by Dave_Hicks

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.